The New World Order: Political
the NWO of the West stands for power of capital, injustice and crime in undermining the rule of law, people of human rights and democracy, exploitation of media freedom, control and Dependence of the population, lies and deceit, she is greedy for power, centralized and de-individualization, destructive, controlling.
The current withholding of direct participation of citizens in political decisions, especially to prevent far-reaching consequences of serious errors (such as the timely regulation of financial markets, with dramatic consequences for the world economy) and failures in international politics can be the more clearly becoming Missmanagemets the delegation leaders in representing citizens 'interests and the citizens' will (vgl.die work of, for example: attacking or citizens initiatives Stuttgar 21) and also in the failure to implement much needed international political changes (see legally binding climate change targets and international social standards, fair trade economic, ecological agriculture, transfer, implementation of an effective natural protection such as the protection of the oceans and their over-fishing, etc.) recognize. They reflect a relentless lobbying for the profit of a few large corporations, it leads to a larger one in politics of the population, to a Extremisierung political groupings and a Instabiliseirung of political societies.
This makes the need for a structural change in the state Funktionsapprates with the aim of the direct influence of Citizens in political decision-making all too clearly. The current actual state of the functional state is among others characterized by a largely ineffective party system, which more and more against each other can be characterized by internal friction within parties or parties. The personalities of the politicians are characterized by the fact more and more by the ability to pool party internally highly media appearances and speeches divergent interests to build ostensible confidence to effect a Machteinhäufung carrying with roped himself to a higher post and medienwirsam with expert help develop a selective impressive image. (see Guttenberg) Here are internal party laws, such as: "in every generation there can be only one (Chancellor)" absurdly maintained and are an expression of inner-party power struggle, with it in the party in a specific period to prevail only one can at the expense of others who then are not more powerful image prepare media attention to this office. This is more constructive and in the revised policy potential lost within a generation of politicians, we can see just at the time at the departure of an entire guard politicians of the Union!
Another shortcoming of the existing political system is the decoupling of policy procedure of the media as the transparency factor and thus the loss of democracy of the system. Instead, the media as part of the public face of the conspiracy abused in the respective decisions of the policy word sleeve-rich and conscious misrepresentation of the purpose for which only partially informed people than glaubhaf t and to "sell" politically appropriate, with a common definition used just A. Merkel here, the decision was "no alternative" was.
example:
the scrapping of old cars and the new purchase of new petrol engine cars, with the support of a large tax burden immensely veschuldeten households, so at the expense of future generations - has been described as a "green project". But in reality it was a captured high-tax support Pofitverbesserung the auto industry in the financial crisis that it could still hope for a new generation of gasoline engine powered cars, which are run in the coming years, the knowledge that in Asia and Australia ElektroPKW on the market come and slept through the Duetsch car builder the development of electric motors simply under the negative influence of the Arabs, who hold a majority of the shares in the auto industry and thus the real beneficiaries of the improved market opportunities were. Was won at once protects enough time to bring biofuels to the market that will bring a better balance of CO2, but in fact to an immense Load of the nature is, as to secure, good agricultural land instead of feeding the world, crops are grown for Ottomotorverrennung, gelichzeitig the eiheimische nature will be charged leave from falling from field margins programs etc. Introduction of monocultures and in addition to rain forests are being cut down! Grotesk! In addition, you could see in German Fermsehen before about 2 years reports that, calculates exactly that it was with the whole action by the demolition still roadworthy car and the early procurement of new vehicles by no means come to a better CO2 balance, as much Energeiimengen were needed to produce the new car! Everything brainwashing. I also would like
remind that in my original blog, before it was partially destroyed, I pointed out that a former Nachbaar has made before about 15 years, the prototype of an electric car for personal use and failed so miserably to produce a small car in series , which was to use as a second car innerstäedtischer well. He literally said that it was not THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC been desired by loss of tax revenue for fuel and cars - control, and not as Konkurrezprodukt for large corporations. Just as I have to wonder, asl, I learned that a Norwegian (Brock) have established a performance-enhanced engine, but were killed after such. I also remember a short note from denTagesschau, which was invented in France years ago, did likewise, an improved Neuantrieb for cars, of which we hear nothing more. These are all concrete evidence that this is not only superficial interest policy, but the lobby has political far-reaching consequences by Lever large corporate interests, market competition, important and prevent much-needed improvement, such as transport with the aim in the long run, bypassing the market competition to secure profits and benefits to maintain existence, no matter what the cost - even murder! Additional comments from the middle class, such as: if we are successful, we are swallowed, show that here Potentential is destroyed, such as myself from the pharmaceutical industry learned that adjusted for the merger of pharmaceutical companies in the best of the existing products after incorporation of the producer in the production was!
Fair Video competition: None at the expense of consumers and the economic chat Lichen progress s, not infrequently at the expense of the environment and the population: instead, we have within the city bear the cost of particulate air pollution, have been discovered as a new market for catalytic converters and exhaust emissions tests shall be in huge sums for noise abatement measures have now and enter -. as I have since hehört-50% rise in risk for cancers, because the population living life in big cities is increasing steadily and we inhale these toxic fumes every day, which yes - remember you are-acutely toxic, lead that is immediately to death higher grade if inhaled! kreberregend And, if inhaled chronic! We also go nicely approached our child is at traffic lights when the gasoline engine will start in full throttle, in the stroller in exhaust amount directly to the road! But the consequences in disease and costs directly and indirectly to man and environment in the omission of the restructuring on the petrol engines are huge! Lobbying has undermined degraded so relentlessly to be a transparent, fair and progressive market competition, which is hereby nämlcih consistent advantage of the existing establishment will!
I also would like a grudge that I could already read more than a year in Australia, that there an electric car is designed for! Hard riding!, Because at the empty battery the next commit "filling station" down and with a simplified snap the dead battery removed and replaced with a full: Fill it up faster than once, and then it goes to the nearest hundred kilometers! (But we know not! Stop information in the media, public stupidity!) And the batteries can be refueled again overnight with cheap electricity, the issue of night storage of electricity would then also be solved!
was now broken my cam in my car, with an engineer to me privately said that they did not break could (manipulation? Stand overnight on the streets), the spare parts more than 1.5 weeks before Christmas is not worried and the engine could be repaired, I would take the train to go home Christmas ", which would have put me in the awkward position of not being able quickly to leave the district of Unna, to me a direct constraint of bringing him before a psychiatrist if repeated insertion of a support case against my to deprive person as two years ago, and has now expanded to the entire engine and sent, was so that I Exclude no longer be that "characteristically," the gasoline engine to me - remote ignition - blow up your ears when I use the car after Christmas would use again! Where did but the Opel Cars causes me to the previous model already various damage with subsequent self-exposure when driving. (Could I be demonstrated by a free workshop!)
So much for rule of law and freedom of speech as a constitutional right in Europe!
These politicians could not and did the necessary national and international progress in society and groups within states fail to implement, despite considerable pressure from citizenry and technical necessity because this in the (undemocratic) to form the NWO conspiracy formed between politicians and big capital Guard are not intended as top priority!
is It is characterized also by a systematic legal undermining the rule of law in recent decades by conspiracy formation of the constitutionally separate state-supporting legislative, jurisprudence, and executive, to the termination of certain portions of the Grundgestzes for the benefit of the relevant officials in the state, and the increasing personal and financial influence of economic groups on the individual policy Entscheidungssträger or government groups that could not last, to the detriment of a balanced market economic system mainly benefit the financially strong (mostly internationally oriented global) economy parts, which thus escape the general fair market competition more and to significant restructuring of the economy and have led agriculture. This interference also causes a lack of democratic control of the jurisprudence and the economy by influencing the Delegantions-politicians, which therefore no longer considered the representation of civil rights as an actual target, but instead, for example. B. To develop a surveillance state inadequate protection of the population and inadequate monitoring of production areas
led Nevertheless, we find that the systems of democracy, communism and Marxism are degenerate as social structures become all too dictatorial-fascist power systems, all of the control of populations with more and better technical capabilities globally practice or seek short or long!
we3rden this case, the populations against each other ausgepielt as workers and increase the markets so their profit margins. This is done using the formula: Fastest High privatize profits, socialize costs, led to a Excess manure immense world of states at the expense of future generations, almost no longer be politically handlugnsfähig! The
confirmed me in thinking that the structures are not only crucial for an effective democracy, but this is only a EIMM Perönlichkeitsbildung of individuals - so complex and difficult as this seems to be always-be successful.
Social skills and team skills with creative innovation will be the main qualities that a politician must identify in the future, across party lines.
This is not to replace, not the best structures, even if they are initially as effective ! Look The decisions will ultimately always choices of each person in the network of structures. In
current structures are considered civil society as citizens, not only controlled sodnern only too glad of the controlled media and their products in their will and decision making can be influenced and directed. This is done particularly in their role as voters, workers and consumers, weobauf the internal focus of the company is worked systematically to money as the center of society and consumption as a replacement drug for a gesellschafltiches together. It is not rejected in the Vorwahlperoide even clumsy choice lies.
The judiciary under the guise free courts have focused increasingly rightfully diffracting hand bearings of governments on the one hand and also to become independent actors in the milieu of Kriminatlität in the billion-dollar sales markets Postituion and drugs on the other hand herauskristliisert and all too often made out to exporting power tools in collaboration with other societies institutions. Here again there is no effective democratic control of the agent to handle and about claiming their responsibility. They stabilized the plot so that both bankers, big business and politicians are not in fact can be made for your handle legally actionable.
to Situation of politics - here as "post-democracy" means-an article from "Parliament" - also available free online, which is only the policy but not the NWO conspiracy described education.
From Politics and History
No. 02-03 / 11.01.2010 - Topic: Political leadership
.... This political leadership, although it takes place in the institutional context of a democracy, but can not lay claim to being democratic leadership in the strict sense of the word, because it operates largely independent of the preferences of citizens. Post
democracy as "leader democracy"
The post-democratic constellation can be determined by Crouch by four features characterize that can be seen increasingly in Western democracies: On the formal-institutional level remain democratic institutions and procedures received, so that the view from outside, without knowing the internal process of democracy, for they normative would keep intact, but the corresponding not the reality, as they have lost heavily in importance for the democratic choice. This second feature of the post-democracy, according to party policy and the competition for votes the parties increasingly of content, the program will later government policy results released be. In place of clear programmatic and discussing political options enter personalized campaign strategies. The contents of the third policy increasingly determines v on the "company", so as a result of interaction of political and economic actors. follows, fourthly, that the citizens guarantor r as demos, not de jure, but de facto deposed . Post democracy in this sense is a sham democracy in institutional housing of a full-fledged democracy.
With the development of post-democracy is changing so the course of political legitimation processes, and political and economic elites are strengthened as the central actors in political systems . You can use the citizens (beyond elections and referenda) as largely inactive and usually politically disinterested mass compared . While the economic actors in general almost invisible act for the public in the background ( or in the lobbies of parliament, government offices and ministries) and thus seen as a social elite hardly try prominent government officials, as a leader a trust and sympathy bonus gain among the citizens z u, of them (later) support for their actions and the re-election secured.
to structural weaknesses of democracy be overcome as well as the problems that arise in modern political communities from their internal pluralization and fragmentation With the help of strong leaders . Where the aggregation of political interests with the help of party political programs and a shared, national or supra-national identity, or not more worse and worse possible threat, democracies are incapable of action. Politicians and citizens increasingly tend to defend the status quo, to take only short-rational decisions and major reforms procrastinate.
can generally be said that the leadership associated with whatever type personalization the role of non-rational elements in the policy promoted and thus from the perspective of citizens has always been regarded as risky.
also on empirical analysis of the post-democratic trend appears problematic. The setting of research shows that in addition to the attestation poor problem-solving ability of democratically elected politicians paternalistic practices also generate frustration with politics for the citizens and contribute
is otherwise expected that the citizens and citizens instead of the current largely silent "escape" into the medium for politics protest against the political leadership and the post-democratization of political systems stride.
................................................ .................................................. ................
This shows, for example, near Stuttgart 21, where the citizens have the parties of the ineffectiveness of their decisions themselves stated, but for years had no political or constitutional methods as a way to change these decisions, the crude use of force used, the question of proportionality because auffwirft was medienumgarnten of pseudo-democratic Verantstaltungen replaced, but who held no legal decision function, yet have a legal obligation in Schlicherspruch, only the function had to reduce the unity in the mob and their resilience over time).
The person of the politician in the party system is characterized above all by the Qualiäten to unite party internally divergent currents upon himself to leave by media-occurrence charismatic style skills impression on the citizens to generate confidence in the success of future projects (gets his job done) and mainly at the expense of political Opponents excel yourself: this always brings to Topgeschäft similar personality profiles. Here are some excerpts from
time online, where the situation and the conduct of politics by the lobbyists is classically described in individual cases.
time online:
The first billion went to the hoteliers. When the government Merkel a year ago for the hotel industry, the VAT decreased by twelve percent, and this "growth acceleration" sold, since such blatant political patronage still appeared as a blip. But the billion gift for the big donors of CSU and FDP was just the beginning. Soon after followed the free purchase of the financial sector from its bad investments in Greece.
Josef Ackermann, the ideal total lobbyist for the global financial industry, had warned of "billion loss for German banks," spurts and the government. The inevitable sooner or later anyway debt relief for the Greek state was postponed and shifted the costs through state guarantees to the taxpayers. The promised participation in the financial sector to the costs of the crisis was against it.
Then came Angela Merkel's "Autumn of the decisions." But it was decided again, mostly favoring those who had the best connections. The power companies were given the life extension for its nuclear power plants, the prospect of 100 billion euros of additional Profits. And different than they were promised in the coalition agreement, the "public authorities" in no way pre-empt 'the essential part "of it, but only one-third.
parallel, organized interest representatives in the Bundestag and the Ministry of Health subsidies to private health insurance and the pharmaceutical industry. The former can more easily solicit future high earners from the statutory cash and get a monopoly on the completion of supplemental insurance. The others may continue to collect on useless, but supposedly innovative medicines astronomical prices, because the newly introduced independent assessment of the costs and benefits is largely done. The relevant government decree assumed equal to entire passages from a draft, which the pharmaceutical company had conveniently been delivered.
, confirms the conservative-liberal government in rapid succession, which is considered by many citizens has long been recognized: Who has the capital and know the better-off section of the population behind him, is served preferentially. Angela Merkel, SPD leader rebelled Sigmar Gabriel, had "allied with lobby groups against the public interest" and jeopardize "the faith in democracy."
Too bad that this was the time of the SPD's participation in the Government has little differently. The Schroeder government was inspired by the pharmaceutical lobby, the long-planned deal with the positive list for drugs that the contributors would have saved billions of euros. They were nominated by the SPD Minister Wolfgang Clement and Werner Müller, by cramming the energy companies in emissions trading tens of billions of profits at the expense of consumers and competition law and mergers zuschanzten. And last but not least, it was the Social Democrat Peer Steinbrueck, who organized the bailout so that the financial industry did not have to contribute a cent to do so.
degenerates Germany so the lobby Republic? Operate financially strong groups in a "creeping subversion of the democratic decision making", as the Constitutional Court Judge Christine Hohmann-Dennhardt complained? The conclusion is obvious and explains little. Finally, is the work of Gesetzeseinflüsterer in the lobby, the entrance hall of the parliament, as old as democracy itself
The promotion of interests of all kinds in people's representatives and leaders has always been as much a democratic process such as elections and parliaments. Also, environmental or social organizations operate lobbying. Yet the unease about the growing influence of unelected lobbyists on the actions of those in power is entirely justified. For it is not just Greenpeace and the workers' welfare, but business organizations and corporations whose secret power of influence is growing.
One of the circumstantial evidence is the occupation of important positions in the ministries have been designated Lobbyists. According to CDU-appointed Environment Minister Röttgen Gerald Hennenhöfer a man to head the Department of Nuclear Safety, which worked until 2004 as General Manager for the Eon Corporation, that company so that is pursuing six of the 17 German nuclear reactors.
As the supreme guardian of nuclear safety, he must now negotiate with his former employer on the retrofitting of old plants. In the transport ministry, meanwhile, was Klaus-Dieter Scheurle appointed Secretary of State. Previously, he has operated as a manager of the Swiss bank Credit Suisse and consultant for investors lobbying for the privatization of the rail while standing against "the influence of state authorities" made strong.
The Ministry of Health in turn leads to Christian Weber, a man of the Department of Policy Issues, who previously worked for nearly 20 years as a top lobbyist for private health insurance and stood up for the weakening of the solidarity principle.
is no less questionable involvement of business lawyers in the drafting of laws that directly affect other clients of the same law firms. Since the Federal Ministry of Finance, the firm Freshfields was responsible for drafting the Law for the Special Fund for the bailout, even though this company is working worldwide for the financial industry.
was on the law on nationalization of HRE Hengeler Müller involved, which was previously for its largest shareholder, the U.S. investor Christopher Flowers, active. Total were involved in the previous Parliament business-oriented law firms at least 17 drafts of important laws and regulations.
runs parallel to the linking of the government apparatus, with economic activity. For example, the "Initiative Financial Location Germany", which sees itself as the 'voice of the industry "for" political discussion with decision makers. " Its members, however, is not only the German Bank and Goldman Sachs, but also the Federal Ministry of Finance. This amalgamation resulted in the advance of the financial crisis later to include the so fatal legalization of unregulated shadow banks outside the banking supervision
belongs in the same category and the widespread use of association and corporate employees as Leihkräfte in the ministries in order to explore their employers early legislative initiatives of all kinds. Fits to continually increase the number of politicians who go directly from government offices to lucrative positions in companies with whose interests they were previously engaged. The long list of these paging presented by former Chancellor Schröder's stake in Gazprom subsidiary Nord Stream on the jump of the Ex-Chancellor's Office Minister and Merkel confidant Hildegard Müller to the top post at the Association of Energy up to the new job of ex-Prime Minister of Hesse Roland Koch, the head of construction group Bilfinger.
common feature of all these developments is that they remove the boundaries between public and private sector actors. The highlight in this malformation supplied the Merkel government with the nuclear pact. Merkel acted as officials from the early hours of a contract with the atomic power manager that allows companies including to offset their tax payments with spending on new security technology.
But at the presentation of their energy program referred to Merkel and her ministers not a word. Just because one of the participating corporate executives inadvertently blurted out the deal, the public learned of it at all. Not negotiated, by contrast with all the companies that have invested in reliance on the implementation of the nuclear phase-out in an environmentally friendly power plants, which now can not compete with the cheap electricity from written-off nuclear plants - a clear break with the state's duty of neutrality and transparency.
All that would be tolerable if the other hand, fulfill his duties as Controller of the federal government and let all these backroom deals would simply explode. Still, that does not occur. Involved in the party discipline and eagerly anxious to make their party prince not to fall into disgrace, the members often leave within a few Meeting days to pass complex laws whose consequences they shall have no lack of time can not.
attested in the case of the putsch-like nuclear deal, therefore, pressed by itself Bundestag President Norbert Lammert (CDU) to his colleagues' lack of care "that did not meet the" Requirements for ordinary laws work. " But that which most elected officials do not exceed their task. For long they are themselves under the spell of the influence trade. Not only are many of them law mandates, consulting agreements and membership of supervisory boards themselves bound by interests that have nothing to do with the common good.
same time, they often cooperate closely with the whisperers all industries, because they are usually far better equipped and informed than themselves "The lobbyist," it recently described the SPD deputy Peter Friedrich agiere rare openness, as the "apparently in support of the Members' usually very successful. "He supports it with arguments, formulation aids, study." All these were "useful things to survive in the political competition." This "merge their interests and goals with those of the lobby," stated Frederick.
piece by piece degenerates in this way the central institution of democracy to a mere Akklamationsveranstaltung for projects in non-transparent circles j enseits all public Control are negotiated. Against this creeping erosion of democracy, it is because ago exactly at this point to initiate the reversal. The first step would be to manufacture the widest possible transparency. This includes not only the establishment of a compulsory register for more than 5,000 lobbyists in Berlin's government district, which would provide them not only their clients but also their budgets, but open access to ministries and parliament.
would be at least as important, the full disclosure of all secondary activities of Members, including an honest listing of their extra income rather than the previously valid ridiculous list more or less than 7000 € a year. Along with this, would have the obligation to indicate on each bill introduced, who has contributed to it as. Even these simple measures would change the daily life of the legislation and the composition of Parliament.
but also needs the Republic no less than a radical revival of the parliamentary idea. The available resources for the parliamentarians are in no relation to the requirements for the governance of a complex industrial society. To control the government really can, the Bundestag would finally be put to independently examine the budgets of ministries in a position to to have cost to make estimates and to appoint independent experts. And to be taken seriously again as a parliament, the Bundestag would also need to get the right to independent investigations, including the ability to perform searches and to seize records, is of course so is the U.S. Congress.
course, all this may not appear utopian. But the increasing choice denial and contempt for public opinion on policy are clear warning signs. Who does not want democracy will degenerate to the folklore and the power is increasingly concentrated in a small economic elite, who must not be content with protest marches, but must fight for the revitalization of the parliaments. They are the most important tool we have.
------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------
contrast, are increasingly protests from citizens who call on the one legitimate participation in decision-making one, especially as more obviously shows that the politician's political decisions not to the common good of population, but more often abuse this as a taxpayer to build on generation of debt, aligning the Etscheid against the people, for not seldom are the concerns of the economy is not the needs of the population!
Online:
The policy is thus concerned itself with too many symptoms of the crisis it has experienced recently. Polls show that the parties trust the Germans, the politicians, even democracy as such, less and less. The progressive aging of the parties for years and other large organizations can not suggest an intact democratic polity.
a more recent addition is a tendency that also indicates a growing resistance to the policy: 2010 was finally the year of citizen protests. The Stuttgart fought against the new underground station, the Hamburger to the new school reform, the Bavarians against the smoking law too lax, the Wendland and many others against nuclear waste transports, the Dresden time to time against the Waldschlösschenbrücke. In Schleswig-Holstein joined forces against the Fehmarn Belt Bridge, in Berlin against the new airport Berlin-Brandenburg and the expansion of A 100
Is this a society of democracy no longer trusts? Of course not. Interest, commitment and willingness are present discourse. So it is reasonable that the politicians do as representatives of an increasingly discredited form of government is concerned about how they can make it more attractive.
These citizens involvement usually have one thing in common: the citizen may criticize, but say in non-t, also online Verfharen are a Sceindemokratie that the politicians - as it had in the past, Mrs Merkel set out a classic, although demand has short because of the financial transactions tax, but has canceled this appearance event quickly.
Wherein lies the problem of the current (political) society
"The normative component requirements of the democratic constitutional state are in fact in regard to the role of citizens who see themselves as authors of the law, more demanding than in relation to the role of corporate citizens the addressees of the law. Of the right addressees expected to help them exercise their individual liberties (and claims) not exceed the legal limits. Otherwise than by compelling obedience to the laws of freedom it is with the motivations and attitudes that are expected of citizens in the role of democratic co-legislator. This
their communication and participation rights are actively exercising, not only in the enlightened self-interest but also of general interest. This calls for a more expensive motivation effort that can not be legally enforced.
example would be a legal duty on voter turnout in the democratic constitutional state as a foreign body as prescribed Solidarity. The willingness of foreign citizens and permanent anonymously if necessary to stand up and take victims for general interests into account, allowed citizens of a liberal public interest will only be sunbathing. Why are political virtues, even if they are "imposed" only in small change, essential to the existence of a democracy. They are a matter of socialization and acclimation in the practices and attitudes of a liberal political culture. The citizenship status is in a sense embedded in a civil society that lives from spontanten who they want to "pre-political" sources.
it does not follow that the liberal state is incapable of his to reprodizieren motivational prerequisites from its own secular stocks. The motives for participation of citizens in political opinion and will certainly live off of for ethical education lifestyles and cultural forms of life, but we must not overlook that develop democratic practices also own political dynamic. Just a rule of law without democracy to which we were in Germany for a long accustomed enough would suggest for Böckenförde question a negative answer:
"Wiewiet can state intentioned people simply from the guarantee of freedom living of the people without a unifying bond that this Feiheit precedes?
The Democratic State shall forward written law not only negative liberties for its own citizens to their well besorgeten society. With the introduction of communicative freedoms he mobilized the participation of citizens in public disputes on issues that affect all together ....
If the moral content of fundamental rights are to take hold in feelings foot, not enough of the cognitive process. Ensichten moral and global consistency in the moral outrage over massive human rights violations alone would suffice only for very thin integration of citizens of a politically constituted world society (if it should be for one day ). In
citizens produces a like always abstract, legally mediated solidarity only when the principles of justice found in the denser mesh of cultural value orientations input.
If the social band rips ...
... A entgleisendeModerniseirung the society as a whole could well make the democratic band mellow and wasting the kind of solidarity to which the democratic state, without being able to enforce law, is dependent. Then would come exactly those Kosnstellation, the Böckenförde in mind: the transformation of citizens prosperous and peaceful liberal societies in isolated, selbstinteresseirt acting monads, which direct their subjektven rights only as weapons against each other. evidence for such an erosion of civic solidarity shown in the larger context of a politically unbeherschten dynamics of world economy and world society.
markets that's not how state governments can take to be democratized, more control functions in areas of life that were previously held together normatively, either politically or through pre-political forms of communication. This not only private spheres increasingly on the mechanisms performance-based, reversed depending on their own preferences-oriented action. Also the area of public legitimacy is subject to constraints shrinks. Reinforced the is civic Privatimus by discouraging loss of function of a democratic opinion and will formation., the time being only in the national arena works reasonably, and therefore no longer veschobenen to supranational levels Prozessee decision reached. The dwindling hope for the policy-making capacity of the international community, the tendency to de-politicize the public. In view of the conflicts and the blatant social injustice in a highly fragmented World society is growing with each failure, the disappointment in the way of a constitutionalization of international law.
Säkulaisierung than twofold and complementary learning process
In contrast to for ethical moderation of nachmetaphysichen thinking, which eludes any general binding concept of good and exemplary life, are made in sacred scriptures and religious traditions, intuitions of sins and salvation, of saving output to a hopelessly articulate experienced life for thousands of years and has been kept alive spelled subtle hermeneutic. can therefore in the community life of religious communities, if they only dogmatism and moral constraints avoid to remain somewhat intact, which is elsewhere lost and with professional knowledge of experts but also can not be re Herget is-I mean sufficiently differential expression and sensitivity for misspent life, for gesellschaftiche pathologies, for the failure of individual life plans and the deformation misleading contexts of life ....
The translation of the image of God in human imperative to ensure equal and dignity of all human beings is such a saving translation. It covers more than the limits of a religious community beyond the content of biblical terms a general audience of other faiths and non-believers ....
I mentioned the diagnosis, after which the modern world in the rehearsed balance betweenthe three big media gets the gesellschaschaftlichen integration in danger, the replacement markets and administrative power, the social solidarity, and thus an act of coordination through values, norms and communicative language use of more and more areas of life . It is also in the own interest of the state Constitution, with all the cultural resources to deal schonened from which fed the standard awareness and solidarity of citizens ...
What the world together.
pre-political moral foundations of a free state.
... there DUCATION first, the A a global society in which individuals are political, economic and cultural forces more and more mutually interdependent and affect in their various habitats and penetrate each other. The other is developing ways of man, of power of making and destroying, which raise far beyond anything previously familiar, the question of the legal and moral control of power .. So can the issue of high priority, as is encountered cultures ethical bases are , lead their coexistence on the right path and a common form of legally responsible restraining order and can build up in power.
that of Hans Küng put forward project "Global Ethic" find such encouragement, indicates definitely that the question is raised ...
are in the process of encounter between cultures and Durchdringug broken for ethical certainties well that had been supporting ...
can now seems obvious that such an ethos of science not produce , so that a renewed ethical awareness not as a product wissenschaflticher debate is concluded. On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the fundamental change in the world and of man, which has arisen from the growing scientific knowledge, are essential in breaking old moral certainties
So it is now but a responsibility of science to the people as people, and particularly the responsibility of the philosophy, the development of every science from a critical perspective, hasty conclusions and Scheingewissehiten about what man is where he came from and why it exists, to critically examine, or, in other words, eliminate the nciht scientific element of the scientific results, that is of mixed , and so the view of the whole, on the other dimensions keep open the reality of being human, of which may show up in science, only partial.
might and right is
Specifically, the d he object of the policy, the measure of the power under law to provide and thus ordenen their significant use. To the right of the stronger sodnern, the strength of the law must apply. Power in the order and in the service of law is the antithesis of violence under which we understand quite loose and unlawful power. Why is important for any society to overcome the suspicion of law and his order, because only then banned arbitrariness and freedom can be lived as a commonly shared freedom. The lawless freedom is anarchy, and why Free Hits destruction. The suspicions against the right to revolt against the right to leave whenever there is no law as an expression of justice in the service of all standing, but rather as product of arbitrariness, as the legal presumption of those who have the power. to make
The task force under the measure of the law refers, therefore, the further question: How is law and what law must be designed so that it is a vehicle of justice, not a privilege of those who have the power law ? set It is both the question of the becoming of the law provided, but other hand, when asked about his own inner dimensions. The problem is that law does not seem an instrument of power less , but an expression of the common interest of all must be to this problem, for now at any rate, achieved by the instruments demokratishcer decision-making, because it involved all the Ensstehen of law and therefore it is right for all and can be respected as such and must. In fact, the guarantee the common participation in the design and right and the just administration of the power of wesenltiche reason in favor of democracy as the most appropriate form of political order.
Nevertheless, I think, is still left a question. Since it is hardly unanimity among men, is the democratic Decision-making as a vital instrument for only one delegation, on the other majority voting left, it being so required by the importance of the question untescheidliche Grössenordnugnen for the majority. But majorities can be blind or unjust. The history shows all too clear. If even a very large majority, a minority, such as a religious or racial, suppressed by oppressive laws, are we supposed to talk about Gerechtigket of law at all? Thus, the majority rule still leaves the question of the ethical foundations of law , the question of whether it is not, what can never be right So what is always in the wrong, or vice versa, what is by its nature inverrückbar right that precedes each Merheitsentscheidung and respected by their needs.
the Modern World has put together a portfolio of such normative elements in the veschiedenen Menscheinrechtserklärungen and removed from the game of majorities. Now, one may be present in consciousness with the internal evidence of these values begnügen.Aber even such self-limitation of questioning has philosphischees Chrarakter. There is ALSO in the standing values, Fogle from the essence of being human and therefore untouchable to all holders of this nature are.
Jürgen Habermas
of: Jürgen Habermas, Joseph Ratzinger
dialectic of secularization, Herder, 2005
Yes, we can
How can or should look like this?
we can transform our society from deligierenden citizens in a communication to the society to be politically mature, load bearing political citizenship in an information society!
We have to do it yourself! We
so much knowledge and expertise in all our minds have accumulated, we have to bring in the public interest so that we achieve the urgently needed progress through change and we need international
could look like this?
are some suggestions on my part, I hereby submit to discussion and would like to suggestions in the concrete form of contact:
Our previous controlled society middle class in a communication society in which we are now, must therefore be replaced by a mature Citizenship in an information society, which exercises its right to directly Miteintscheidung Commercialisation and public welfare oriented than verantworungsvolle authors of the law, as
"open society". However, this requires
of its citizens more sympathy for the common good and public welfare issues, and this sympathy is not the individuals are forced, however this must be granted. The citizen as an individual account it says the same area as an entity apart from all other gesellschafltichen groups who may also take over its rights to participate in state-supporting functions.
In the parliaments have directly elected citizens sitting as a full-time politician, building from which the ministries, staffed by different disciplines.
In the parliaments negotiated the new rules to be decided, they have also the task of governments in the ministries to control effekiv.
The ministries in turn are made up of professionals of various disciplines who are also elected directly from the people, the politicians with the most total votes they have received leitstungsorientiert where they place in government responsibility, implementation and management of government work.
can in Parliament or any citizen Minstierien or entity, including corporations, as in petition - enter directly online problems and their solutions. Dabaei, Parliament and ministries on both sides of the task to edit and incorporate into their task.
Parliament must have the task of controlling the work of the ministries effectively with the directly elected authorities who want to be ever re-elected to power,
come Once again the media in the future a major task, since they both access made to all ( online) entries, the ideas and proposals for legislation, which are received in the parliamentary debate, the overall work of the parliament, the parliament and the individual ministries to assess, comment and have to interpret. such as in "Members Watch" - - It will work and performance profiles of the acting person by themselves asl own profile and from the media age, where their parliamentary and Ministerialarbeit is berurteilt, so that citizens are informed and can decide later who the best and has developed promising solutions for the company, has implemented and has been characterized by previous political benefits. This is the basis for the citizens who give their votes at the next election and who they choose in the ministries, across party lines.
Parliamentarians can draw on specialized areas restricted in their activities.
The seats to be filled will be determined in accordance with requirements of individual departments.
A party affiliation is then theoretically not necessary, but may well be available, in principle, but only the personal power of a single member of parliament or ministerial Lange presented for further career be decisive!
performance and transparency instead of NWO-corruption!
task of the elected professional politicians, therefore it will be going increasingly to act as a service of society as a whole to make the note competent reformers and decisions of this / n mature citizen (s) pick inserted to participate on gesellschafltichen life implementation, and in an existing context at all levels of communities (community, Lades and federal parliaments) make sense to integrate, and these must then act as a performer not only on behalf of society, but also the responsibility (!) connect and have not seen before - once elected, an act of freedom had to push through projects against the general will of people on the ground. A legal responsibility will be paid - are possibly also with the private property where.
Berufspolitker This new standard will be in their functions by specialized knowledge, organizational skills, Teanfähigkeit, creativity, and characterized by negotiation and representation, they can, depending on the services previously accomplished and acquired Vorkenntissen be elected by the citizens directly and thus by job performance and clear successes, work their way onto introduce higher levels of responsibility. They connect with their own profile, where they state their objectives and political ideas of the legislature and illustrate. At the same time they receive from free media to assess their achievements and their professional knowledge they have acquired. So called parteitinterne list positions is accounted for, ie, the mature and informed citizenship is Even those with responsibility for the task, depending on the proven performance and political objectives of the further professional career of the politician (!) - he was free of influence or of a party belonging to the composition of the un-influencing parliaments and ministries directly.
to this process, the politicians and the people themselves on folk Sent Heath (on-line resort.
This active involvement requires an effective and successful information accompanying the citizens and a long-term interest in political issues. This is a technically good work-up need for political action and Vermitlung derselbsen by hochqulifizierte media to prime time in the public - owned media, this is one of their main jobs. The company
citizens in a society, we communicate about the "responsible citizens in society The former information!
can in important decisions and changes to existing standards while also be funded to a direct popular decision, or they are introduced. Here, the participation of the responsible citizens have of course build on existing national and international rights.
put Participation voting in elections or referenda on the special responsibility before the society's prior successful and comprehensive Information about the issues ahead of problems, because otherwise a responsible public good decision can be guaranteed. The responsible citizen is so motivational and time required. The issue of false Merheitsentscheidung is minimized, however. This can be further reduced also by as many important legislative items to the constitutional right to be, explicitly, and thus irrevocably a future (majority) be withdrawn decision. (ZBder and animal creation, protection, and thus always possible, less intrusive and life-friendly solutions are found must!)).
The mature and actively mitentscheinden citizens it is up to the legal representatives who directly apply the state law on the individual members of society to choose depending on the previous function and quality and use, all state representatives alike in the exercise of government function for vosätzliche offense may be held liable and recourse. It is the democratic control of the state and legal system and the political representatives in their essential function to prevent abuse. (Courts, prosecutors, politicians) A direct assumption of responsibility does not apply to people one-distinctions. This will mean that politicians landmark case of large will turn back selsbt decisions to the people for protection.
The forces and ideas must be able to directly gain access to the parliaments, who must then deal
in its legislative function and therefore are held to address these ideas, evaluate and properly integrate into the existing social order to implement. Here, citizen / community groups, NGOs and society stakeholders, including businesses they enter there directly. It must be a sham democratic employment of Germans are replaced with a real opportunity to participate ability. Only when the real power converted parliamentarians also for ordering and pricing is critical, these inputs are taken seriously, and all the more so the more people have also been translated for implementation. And has entered not as in the present pseudo-democracy, people's financial transactions tax by online petition, but rumgeredet only stupid, was Mrs Merkel, then very carefully times to be confirmed at the international level, the Kapaitel but stopped quickly and that's it!
the media - if at all, only paritiätisch and effectively controlled directly-democratic - are used in information societies with modern citizenship also has a key task of immense importance, namely, not only on the local, national and international current socio-political events and their elected actors (such as politicians and legal representatives) to provide information freely, fully and critically, but also about the entered political partaking (ideas, laws, amendments, improvements, suggestions, etc.) to report to the citizens / entities that work up this intelligible to comment, to explain the context and interpreted in historical context. You have just as other gesellschaflliche agencies, such as the churches play an important role in the decision-making and decision of the individual States citizen at all levels of community education (Municipalities, countries, states, communities) par excellence, and are involved in the task of assessing the work of state representatives directly.
The participation in political decisions must therefore be so far makes it easier than this, the necessary information for this aufgabeitet on time and as quickly as possible available, set out allgeimeinverständlich and easy access by the media. This sol
influencing the population has selsbtverherlichende Image scenario campaign of individual leaders
Control of the media to account for. They are subject to the market, ie those who have the best and most objective information and its understandable provide work-up and transparency of the political work to be on the market at the best at all community levels (municipal, state, state parliaments) have sales. If a check is done, then only to prevent a corruption between politicians and the media in their assessment of government, parliamentary activities and the performance of individual politicians or to prevent it.
can nevertheless build up the system of direct participation of the citizens of directional critical question of starting slowly, depending on the "maturity" or participation desire of society to be strengthened.
Technical possibilities to exist already, even if they previously only be used almost exclusively to communicate in private. The local (civic offices) are specifically asked to allow access to participation. The protection of these networks is to get a special attention to.
Corruption must be geahnded, with loss of work permits in this area, the prospect of wasted re-election and the recourse to their own personal assets of politicians and all government employee! Farewell, freedom fools! For this we need a functioning public prosecutor!
The participation of the citizen in decision-making in different areas of the common good will so far according to experience moderate interest- Fluctuate as they relate sometimes only portions of the populations directly. It is also expected to as well so that the answer will remain on issues of special area according to experience only a few technically denied, on the other hand, need not necessarily those decisions are supported by the total population. It is therefore the task of developing etc. Politikwissenschalfter a viable system that Allgemeingütligkeit of judgments and sympathy of all or parts of the citizenship of the other part has to be reconciled.
The quality of training, education and maturation of individuals to empower citizens is ultimately this one if not the central role and importance in the future at all to. For as history has shown, it is not the legal structures of a state or the society itself, which accounts for the functioning of a state, but the individual agent as a person who represents them. The formation of a! Social skills! in the education and maturation process in the way individuals entrusted to foster active citizen is to become the leading quality of the "society of the responsible citizenship" in gesellschafltichen welfare system. This task must be by the citizens themselves in families, social groups, governmental and private organizations, institutions or society representatives sightings, so like the churches, are made. Their quality is crucial to not only make tomorrow's know-how of the next generation, but especially the socially aware cultivate responsible citizens in future societies. This is not only a right but a duty is only increasing the maturing individual and against the State as such, in particular to facilitate the issue of equal opportunities to participate in the fabric of society. In other words, a parent, we considered not only as a guardian, but also has a sstaatsbürgerliche Pfllicht to assume this responsibility. Participation the public education system must be free and funded by the state.
The specific design of these structural changes in our present form of government or other changes to improve participation by responsible citizens and other entities is not a direct responsibility my job, but allgemeingesellschafliche task with particular emphasis on state rights activists, social and political scientists and churches and all professional institutions, the I have all so far in the analysis and discussion Geamt Sion of the existing grievances was missing too often.
this, I see myself as a medical doctor here is not primarily committed and competent.
But I know one thing: it can and can not go there!
I as German a responsibility to my country in light of the history of Germany and that too - although only to a small historical section, but nonetheless still consequential, - as we had to make German experience, as a thoroughly mendacious system of the fascism of the Third Reich miss led an entire people, indoctrinated and has resulted in violation of human rights of millions in exclusion, failure, oppression, misery and suffering and death-world,
I can not accept it, that this "hidden economic - Faschimus "continues in the Western world and nothing else than a copy of this system as "economic fascism in its Urdefinition (Origianldefinition of fascism: Company Controlling)
and then I would like nothing more that may come from Germany, another international spirit is carried into the world, a spirit Common, cooperation instead of war against each other, respect and encounters between people, as we are dealing in the common coexistence of artistic-cultural field, in science, and even within business enterprises have long able to: why not political!
because we are aware of a need: we're sitting here all on one beautiful planet Earth, the us "borrow" only from generation to generation, the receipt and sharing of all of us together in a peaceful way to the heart must be: who, if not we should with our experience of German fascism is therefore the responsibility to transform this capitalism !
When I hear that there are various financial schools interpret the financial system all different and it exists no uniform binding scale more to evaluate this vast structure nor to evaluate or plan ahead: then this degenerate completely and so deregulated that one here with much more fundamental change and simplifications achieve the aim of stabilizing must, as this has not yet implemented!
The financial system must be made independent service provider for business and not be cut because deregulated break entire economies far!
Then I ask myself whether the savings banks, so anyway as a non - profit company to run, the same can not be converted into Ökofairtrade banks. pull
And the economy does not destroy its over greed nature and boundless exploit and take advantage of people worldwide, in Abhängigkiet, control and the pure consumer degrade and play as workers against each other for the benefit of the owners of capital, but must be accompanied by a free science and a controlled Justice be a service provider companies. It must develop a social market economy GLOBALĂ towards a common good economy.
Here kan be set yardsticks in their control to protect consumers, we have the power to enact laws for the proper protection of consumers and introducing weltwieter social standards in global markets because, just because defined iwr as consumers in it and allow the markets we are dependent on: Together we can do it!
non-capital, banking and global Wirschaftssysteme in association with corrupt politicians need to closed economic forums, in short procedures between lobby representatives and lubricated with donations to political parties found in ministries or in secret Bilderberg meeting, the decisions about people, but we, the companies themselves!
This is not without struktuereller change in policy and changes within society.
We have the tables herumgedrehen by democratic means: Unmark all parties! Go there and make invalid ballots
resistance, denial, simply for our future and that of humanity!
deselect all parties! Go there and ballots invalid!
Otherwise we drink with the conspiracy of the NWO "dare more democracy" in the truest sense of the word from
: 35 years ago an advertising slogan of the "SPD", which was not realized until today!
!!!!! The entire state is the brain!! We all
Here are some concrete suggestions as to specific aspects of discourse: We will need
Vollzeitpoltiker in the future, to implement a service of the societies, that which is due to be released on Entsheidungen, ideas and problems.
should also be given by local authorities, ministries and states Länderminsiterien open to good ideas that people from the population as well as from NGOs, political parties or other institutions, science and typing technique for the policy decision and implementation may, instead of good politicians of the opposite party, as well Schäuble operates in Finanzminsiterium just to chill. These internal friction within parties or between parties but Germany does not advance! The ISND but only obstacles.
And it must have direct access to public media, and discuss this, so just nothing unseen in the trash ends up: Merciless transparency.
If the politicians by a neutral "rating system" publicly transparent by the citizens in their political handlers, their objectives and measured in front of all their achievements directly indie singling Ministries can be selected or can be lifted directly depending on merit and performance shown in the respective introduce higher national or interna tional office, then at last would merit good hands too to wear and not just the eternal Parteiengekummel and fed schanze of higher cushy positions with the tiresome boys' and the intra-party Gemauschle .
Naürlich can people do with similar sentiments, and fight together in parties on possible solutions and discuss!
And it also requires a greater direct participation, for example, in the elections of the President, this election may also be coupled with government elections to this system is not more expensive!
The salary I was going to work, however, because a live long high pay with valet and car (and now it starts at Wulf already with 50, for several decades -?) A disproportionate enrichment at public expense, not only of oneself in the millions, but then you samiert so also his entire family in the next generation. This is unreasonable!
DasAmt needs of people with non-partisan representative of the entire people darstellen.damit this free and decide according to his conscience to decide whether laws have also been correct about. And he must be liable for violation of the law.
The judiciary must therefore refomiert druchgreifend be. Examples of specific versions of this I've already made.
And that is collected and used for this neutral non-partisan Office of an old party friend of the government because of the then writes the laws against besssrern knowledge that seeks to fight the government lobby groups against majorities, and then good - vosätzlich contrary to the function of the Office broke the law office commits-like now recently our dear faithful mother-type Wulf for Angela!
And if you then also the politicians in office for offenses punishable and actionable really does, then fall back with far-reaching revisions Decided on referendums to dan not sole responsibility to bear!
And if the judges shall be elected at the Kommunlawahlen after a public rating system for another 4-5 years and is also controlled and monitored for the proceedings must also be accessible and approachable and not as I've experienced it, who hangs up the handset or did not decrease when he informs on his display of intelligence knows who is behind the numbers to call in, so you can bring no relief to his person while he is in the process responsible! and not for life in a fool-free system of the alleged Self-regulation can and to focus especially uncontrolled peaceable criminal activities!
Every politician should have his image by a transparent and fremdbeurteiltes grading system and not (on Weigend men) by cliques made within the parties themselves have been cobbled his next cushy positions!
The future of Europe can only lie in education and science and culture.
Our characteristic is the diversity in societies and cultures in different regions. Europe is decentralized and not central Europe is diverse and varied and not equalization!
And this is our strength when we do not understand that it is the variety of decentralized individual solutions that are needed in the future: a decentralized regional offer different solutions, science and technology have to offer but as a synthesis of knowledge. They should free up people and make independent, rather than dependent, must be the path.
The times in which we have only made war, we have spent vast sums and erwirtschatet to each other to bring evil, destruction and death at last give way to an international public good in the third millennium.
We are all in the same boat, so we do not capsize:
instead of violence, destruction and exploitation and control
reason and social and peaceable Miteinandner and participation for all,
We all!
Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
0 comments:
Post a Comment